Objective: Websites serve as the showcase for sports clubs, and their optimal design attracts users. Combining two evaluation models with a modern approach offers a unique method for presenting an innovative model. The aim of the present study was to develop a framework for designing the web pages of private sports clubs based on the evaluation and comparative analysis of private sports clubs in Iran, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain. Methodology: The research method, in terms of its objective, was applied and descriptive-comparative in nature. The statistical population of this study comprised 80 websites of private sports clubs in Iran, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Spain. To identify the websites of private sports clubs, Google Maps and its advanced settings (selecting the location for the keyword search) were used, along with the keyword “private sports club” in the four countries. Website evaluation was conducted based on the ISO9126-1 model in accordance with the IEEE1061 license. In this evaluation, two models-Web Assessment Index and Web-QEM-were employed. The checklist for the first model (Marincas and Vultur, 2007) includes five main criteria: accessibility, navigability, speed, reliability, and content, assessed on a five-point scale ranging from “very unsuitable” (0-20) to “very suitable” (81-100). The second model (Olsina et al., 1999) consists of four main criteria: usability, functionality, reliability, and efficiency, evaluated on a five-point scale from 0 to 1. In this study, various online and offline software tools were used for the analysis of the criteria. Findings: The results showed that the final ranking of the websites according to both the Web-QEM and Web Assessment Index evaluation methods was, respectively, the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, and Iran. In the Web-QEM method, the websites of the United Kingdom scored 70.6%, Spain 67.15%, Germany 61.3%, and Iran 47.5% out of 100. In the Web Assessment Index method, the websites of the United Kingdom scored 69.55%, Spain 68.85%, Germany 60.25%, and Iran 42.7% out of 1. In both methods, the websites of private sports clubs in the United Kingdom demonstrated the best status, while those in Iran showed the weakest. Conclusion: Managers of private sports clubs should devote the greatest attention to improving the evaluation standards of their clubs’ websites in order to achieve suitable professional success in their business.
Published in | International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20251003.17 |
Page(s) | 133-154 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Evaluation, Design Pattern, Private Sports Clubs, Web Pages
Club’s Name | Website’s Links | Club’s Name | Website’s Links |
---|---|---|---|
Zaraban | zaraban.group | Arsha Club | arshaclub.com |
Shahin | www.shahinkerman.ir | Cheshmeh Complex | cheshmehclub.com |
Mobarez Academy | www.fighter-ac.ir | Bahrampour Complex | bahrampourclub.com |
Asiabadi | asiabody.com | Part Novin | partnovin.com |
Soboika | souboukai.asnaf.top | Rosha | r8fitness.com |
Miead | www.hungar.org | Energy + | energyplus.ir |
Padideh | padidehclub.com | Zaki | zakee.ir |
Bahrami | bahramiclub.com | Kahkeshan | kahkeshan-gym.ir |
Ayandeh Sazan | www.asbasket.com | Sinergy | monavari-gym.com |
Iran Chess | www.shatranjiran.com | Rea | rheaclub.ir |
Club’s Name | Website’s Links | Club’s Name | Website’s Links |
---|---|---|---|
Richmond volleyball | richmondvolleyball.co.uk | Swim Ireland | swimireland.ie |
Better | better.org.uk | Surfing England | surfingengland.org |
Badminton wales | badminton.wales | DG1 leisure | dg1leisure.co.uk |
Basketball Northern Ireland | basketballni.com | Nothing Hill | bodyworkswest.co.uk |
Basketball Wales | basketball.wales | McLaren leisure | mclarenleisure.co.uk |
Basketball Scotland | basketballscotland.co.uk | Haddington ASC | swimhaddington.co.uk |
Ayr Storm | ayrstorm.com | Roehampton | roehamptonclub.co.uk |
Baseball-Softball UK | baseballsoftballuk.com | Parsons Green | parsonsgreenclub.com |
England Squash | englandsquash.com | Glasgow Nomads | glasgownomads.co.uk |
Sport Northern Ireland | sportni.net | All Stars Boxing | allstars-gym.co.uk |
Club’s Name | Website’s Links | Club’s Name | Website’s Links |
---|---|---|---|
Fit Klusiv | fitklusiv.de | Tennis in Berlin | svbb-tennis.de |
SG Stern | sgstern.de | Mag DeBurg Golf | firstgolf-magdeburg.de |
Well You Fitness | wellyou.eu | SAFO | sportclub-safo.de |
Tennis Club SCC Berlin | tcsccberlin.de | Londes sport Bund | landessportbund-hessen.de |
JF Club | justfit-club.com | Strandbad Grunau 1908 | strandbadgruenau.de |
SC Frankfurt 80 | sc1880.de | Bayerischer Landes-sport Vernad e.v. | blsv.de |
Lufthansa Sportverein | lsvham.de | Rheinland-PFALZ | lsb-rlp.de |
MunichHealth Sports Club | munichhealthclub.com | Urban Sports Club | urbansportsclub.com/en |
Leo’s Sports Club | leos.tv | McFit | mcfit.com/de |
Private Sport Club | private-sportsclub.de | Green Gym Berlin | greengymberlin.de |
Club’s Name | Website’s Links | Club’s Name | Website’s Links |
---|---|---|---|
Bel Air Tennis Club | belairtennis.com | The Club Gym | jointheclub.es |
Don Carlos | doncarlosresort.com | Fit Club Mallorca | fitclubmallorca.com |
Club Del Sol | tenniscostadelsol.com | David Lloyd | davidlloyd.es |
Reial Club De Tennis | rctb1899.es | Club Fit | club-fit.eu |
Puente Romano | puenteromano.com | Real Canoe N.C. | realcanoe.es |
Manolo Santa | manolosantana.es | CN Metropole | cnmetropole.com |
Elite Tennis Academy | elitennis.com | Club Delmar | clubdelmardesanamaro.com |
Miraflores Tennis Club | miraflorestennisclub.com | Abama Golf | abamagolf.com |
Royal Tennis Club | royaltennisclub.com | Bfit Ibiza Sports Club | bfitibiza.com |
Health Club Maspalomas | maspalomasgym.com | Havana Gym Maspalomas | havana-gym.com |
Type | Name |
---|---|
Online | Google PageSpeed Insights |
Online | GTmetrix.com |
Online | Jetseo.ir |
Online | analytics.upseo.ir |
Online | WAVE Evaluation Tool |
Online | EqualWeb Accessibility Checker |
Offline | SSW Link Auditor 4.41 |
Offline | SiteMonitor Enterprise 4.03 |
Offline | Xens link sleuth |
Offline | Screaming Frog SEO Spider |
Index | Web Assessment Index | Total | Average Score | Standard Deviation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | Medium | Desirable | Very Desirable | |||
Accessibility | 0% | 5% | 60% | 30% | 5% | 100% | 6.15 | 1.348 |
Speed | 15% | 15% | 30% | 40% | 0% | 100% | 5.45 | 2.038 |
Navigation | 10% | 40% | 20% | 25% | 5% | 100% | 5.05 | 2.089 |
Reliability | 20% | 10% | 10% | 40% | 20% | 100% | 6 | 2.902 |
Content | 15% | 55% | 25% | 5% | 0% | 100% | 20.05 | 9.053 |
Final Result | 5% | 35% | 35% | 25% | 0% | 100% | 8.54 | 2.68 |
Index | Web-QEM | Total | Average Score | Standard Deviation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | Medium | Desirable | Very Desirable | |||
Usability | 5% | 35% | 45% | 10% | 5% | 100% | 0.2215 | 0.08331 |
Functionality | 55% | 10% | 5% | 5% | 25% | 100% | 0.0656 | 0.06104 |
Reliability | 20% | 15% | 25% | 25% | 15% | 100% | 0.0620 | 0.03222 |
Performance | 10% | 15% | 10% | 50% | 15% | 100% | 0.1260 | 0.1260 |
Final Result | 5% | 35% | 35% | 25% | 0% | 100% | 0.1188 | 0.03873 |
Index | Web Assessment Index | Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | Medium | Desirable | Very Desirable | |||
Accessibility | 0% | 10% | 15% | 15% | 60% | 100% | 8.30 | 2.17 |
Speed | 0% | 0% | 35% | 45% | 20% | 100% | 7.20 | 1.32 |
Navigation | 0% | 20% | 15% | 15% | 50% | 100% | 7.55 | 2.58 |
Reliability | 5% | 5% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 100% | 7.45 | 2.13 |
Content | 0% | 10% | 30% | 45% | 15% | 100% | 39.05 | 10.73 |
Final Result | 0% | 10% | 10% | 50% | 30% | 100% | 13.91 | 3.11 |
Index | Web-QEM | Total | Average Score | Standard Deviation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | Medium | Desirable | Very Desirable | |||
Usability | 5% | 10% | 20% | 50% | 15% | 100% | 0.3085 | 0.10132 |
Functionality | 20% | 20% | 5% | 5% | 50% | 100% | 0.1090 | 0.06464 |
Reliability | 5% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 75% | 100% | 0.0995 | 0.02328 |
Performance | 0% | 0% | 0% | 15% | 85% | 100% | 0.1890 | 0.02075 |
Final Result | 0% | 10% | 10% | 50% | 30% | 100% | 0.1765 | 0.03827 |
Index | Web Assessment Index | Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | Medium | Desirable | Very Desirable | |||
Accessibility | 0% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 40% | 100% | 7.90 | 1.804 |
Speed | 0% | 5% | 20% | 65% | 10% | 100% | 7.10 | 1.334 |
Navigation | 0% | 35% | 15% | 30% | 20% | 100% | 6.25 | 2.197 |
Reliability | 5% | 0% | 15% | 50% | 30% | 100% | 7.25 | 1.943 |
Content | 5% | 0% | 15% | 50% | 30% | 100% | 31.75 | 9.722 |
Final Result | 0% | 10% | 30% | 50% | 10% | 100% | 12.05 | 2.72 |
Index | Web-QEM | Total | Average Score | Standard Deviation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | Medium | Desirable | Very Desirable | |||
Usability | 0% | 25% | 25% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 0.2855 | 0.08114 |
Functionality | 30% | 30% | 5% | 15% | 20% | 100% | 0.0790 | 0.05812 |
Reliability | 0% | 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 100% | 0.0835 | 0.02477 |
Performance | 0% | 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 100% | 0.1650 | 0.02819 |
Final Result | 0% | 10% | 30% | 50% | 10% | 100% | 0.1533 | 0.03426 |
Index | Web Assessment Index | Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | Medium | Desirable | Very Desirable | |||
Accessibility | 0% | 0% | 5% | 10% | 85% | 100% | 9.55 | 1.05 |
Speed | 0% | 0% | 25% | 55% | 20% | 100% | 7.45 | 1.19 |
Navigation | 0% | 10% | 10% | 25% | 55% | 100% | 8.20 | 2.21 |
Reliability | 5% | 0% | 15% | 50% | 30% | 100% | 7.60 | 2.01 |
Content | 0% | 15% | 35% | 45% | 5% | 100% | 36.05 | 9.48 |
Final Result | 0% | 0% | 35% | 60% | 15% | 100% | 13.77 | 2.10 |
Index | Web-QEM | Total | Average Score | Standard Deviation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Very Undesirable | Undesirable | Medium | Desirable | Very Desirable | |||
Usability | 0% | 5% | 10% | 85% | 0% | 100% | 0.3445 | 0.06878 |
Functionality | 20% | 50% | 10% | 0% | 20% | 100% | 0.0710 | 0.05300 |
Reliability | 0% | 0% | 0% | 45% | 55% | 100% | 0.0955 | 0.01234 |
Performance | 0% | 5% | 5% | 35% | 55% | 100% | 0.1605 | 0.03576 |
Final Result | 0% | 0% | 25% | 60% | 15% | 100% | 0.1679 | 0.02889 |
Web-QEM | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Between Groups | 0.039 | 3 | 0.013 | 10.408 | 0.001 |
Within Groups | 0.094 | 76 | 0.001 | ||
Total | 0.133 | 79 |
(I) Country | (J) Country | Mean Difference (I-J) | Std. Error | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Iran | Germany | -0.03449* | 0.01115 | 0.017 |
Spain | -0.04911* | 0.01115 | 0.001 | |
England | -0.05774* | 0.01115 | 0.001 | |
Germany | Iran | 0.03449* | 0.01115 | 0.017 |
Spain | -0.01463 | 0.01115 | 1.000 | |
England | -0.02325 | 0.01115 | 0.242 | |
England | Iran | 0.05774* | 0.01115 | 0.001 |
Spain | 0.02325 | 0.01115 | 1.000 | |
Germany | 0.00862 | 0.01115 | 1.000 | |
Spain | Iran | 0.04911* | 0.01115 | 0.001 |
Germany | 0.01463 | 0.01115 | 0.242 | |
England | -0.00862 | 0.01115 | 1.000 |
Web Assessment Index | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Between Groups | 375.420 | 3 | 125.140 | 17.510 | 0.001 |
Within Groups | 543.148 | 76 | 7.147 | ||
Total | 918.568 | 79 |
(I) Country | (J) Country | Mean Difference (I-J) | Std. Error | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Iran | Germany | -3.51000* | 0.84538 | 0.001 |
Spain | -5.24000* | 0.84538 | 0.001 | |
England | -5.37000* | 0.84538 | 0.001 | |
Germany | Iran | 3.51000* | 0.84538 | 0.001 |
Spain | -1.73000 | 0.84538 | 0.265 | |
England | -1.86000 | 0.84538 | 0.185 | |
England | Iran | 5.37000* | 0.84538 | 0.001 |
Spain | 0.13000 | 0.84538 | 1.000 | |
Germany | 1.86000 | 0.84538 | 0.185 | |
Spain | Iran | 5.24000* | 0.84538 | 0.001 |
Germany | 1.73000 | 0.84538 | 0.265 | |
England | -0.13000 | 0.84538 | 1.000 |
Web-QEM Criteria | Code | Web Assessment Index Criteria | Code |
---|---|---|---|
Usability | GHU | Accessibility | GHD |
Functionality | GHA | Speed | SPD |
Reliability | GHE | Navigation | MHT |
Performance | KAR | Reliability | NAV |
Content | GHT |
Degree of Importance | Most Important | least Important |
---|---|---|
Criteria | Speed | Content |
Criteria | Code | Most Important (1-9) | least Important (1-9) |
---|---|---|---|
Usability | GHU | 2 | 7 |
Functionality | GHA | 3 | 6 |
Reliability | GHE | 5 | 3 |
Performance | KAR | 2 | 8 |
Accessibility | GHD | 8 | 1 |
Speed | SPD | 1 | 9 |
Content | MHT | 9 | 1 |
Navigation | NAV | 2 | 4 |
Reliability | GHT | 5 | 3 |
Criteria | weight | Criteria | weight |
---|---|---|---|
Usability | 0.15332198 | Accessibility | 0.02555366 |
Functionality | 0.10221465 | Speed | 0.2555663 |
Reliability | 0.06132879 | Content | 0.03407155 |
Performance | 0.15332198 | Navigation | 0.15332198 |
Reliability | 0.06132879 |
aBW | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Compatibility Index | 0.44 | 1.00 | 1.63 | 2.30 | 3.00 | 3.73 | 4.47 | 5.23 |
Criteria aBW | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 0.2087 | 0.2087 | 0.2087 | 0.2087 | 0.2087 | 0.2087 | 0.2087 |
4 | 0.1581 | 0.2352 | 0.2738 | 0.2928 | 0.3102 | 0.3151 | 0.3273 |
5 | 0.2111 | 0.2848 | 0.3019 | 0.3309 | 0.3479 | 0.3611 | 0.3741 |
6 | 0.2164 | 0.2922 | 0.3565 | 0.3924 | 0.4061 | 0.4168 | 0.4225 |
7 | 0.2090 | 0.3313 | 0.3734 | 0.3931 | 0.4035 | 0.4108 | 0.4298 |
8 | 0.2267 | 0.3409 | 0.4029 | 0.4230 | 0.4379 | 0.4543 | 0.4599 |
9 | 0.2122 | 0.3653 | 0.4055 | 0.4225 | 0.4445 | 0.4587 | 0.4747 |
Input-Based Compatibility Ratio | Associated Threshold |
---|---|
0.08333333 | 0.3662 |
Criteria | Ranks | Criteria | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Speed | 1 | Functionality | 3 |
Usability | 2 | Reliability | 4 |
Navigation | 2 | Reliability | 4 |
Performance | 2 | Content | 5 |
Accessibility | 6 |
CDN | Content Delivery Network |
SEO | Search Engine Optimization |
WAI | Web Assessment Index |
Web-DANM | Web Design Assessment and Novel Methods |
Web-QEM | Web Quality Evaluation Method |
[1] | AL-Dulaimi, A., & Al-Mashhadany, S. (2023). Quality and performance evaluation metrics of websites: a systematic literature review. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 8, 84-99. |
[2] | Amal Alqahtani, Bothaynah Alshehri, Maram Alqahtani, Manar Abumelha, Muneerah Alshabanah, Daniah Alrajhi, Mutasem K. Alsmadi and Ibrahim Almarashdeh. (2020), Developing and Implementing a Website for Sports Clubs, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology IJSRST | Volume 7, Issue 2, 395-602. |
[3] | Baghban, H. Toudar, S. R. Sam Delizi, Z. Naseri Malvani, A. (2011), the evaluation of the websites of Islamic Azad Universities and the position of the website of Islamic Azad University of Maroodasht branch in this system. Quarterly Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, Year 1, Number 4, pp. 59-79. |
[4] | Begami, Z. Hamidi, M. Khabeiri, M. (2015), Internet Marketing in Football Clubs: Evaluation of the Website Quality of Successful Iranian and European Football Clubs, Sports Management Studies, No. 34, pp. 155-176. |
[5] | Burgess S. Bingley S. Parker C. M. (2021), The value of local sporting clubs’ websites, Information & Management Volume 58, Issue 8, December 2021, 103531. |
[6] | Choi K. You K. (2012), Web Accessibility Evaluation of Professional Sports Clubs in Korea, |
[7] | Farhibozehnjani, B. (2010), Development of Management, Development of Managers (Basics, Techniques and Methods), First Edition, Tehran, Imam Hossein University Publications. |
[8] | Firouzabadi M. Fayyazi, M. (2016), A reflection on management development models as a development infrastructure, International Congress of Community Empowerment in the field of management, economics, entrepreneurship and cultural engineering. |
[9] | Gharibehniazi M. (2013), Evaluation of the websites of Iran's public universities with two methods of Web-QEM and Web Assessment Index and comparison of their results, master's thesis in the field of library and information sciences, Al-Zahra University (S), Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Department of Information Sciences, Librarianship and science. |
[10] | Gharibehniazi, M. Karbala-Aghaei-Kamran, M. Ghaebi, A. (2015), Website quality assessment methods: Web-QEM methods and Web Assessment Index, Journal of Library Studies and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, 15th row, pp: 119-142. |
[11] | Hadiri, K. Valadbeigi, F. (2014), Investigating the impact of information-communication technology evolution on Iranians' daily life style, National Conference on Islamic Life Style and its place in the era of globalization. |
[12] | Jafari, H. Taqwa-Fard, M. T. Hanafizadeh, P. Kazazi, A. (2018), Native Model of Quality Evaluation of News Sites (NEWSQUAL), Soft Computing and Information Technology, Volume 7, Number 1, pp: 56-71. |
[13] | Korooki, A. (2025A), Designing the index model for compiling and evaluating the websites of Iran's private sports clubs, Sport Science Quarterly Jahesh, Vol 2, Issue 3, pp: 39-52. |
[14] | Korooki, A. (2025B), Evaluation and comparative comparison of the state of sports Internet services in the last 10 years, Sport Science Quarterly Jahesh, Vol 2, Issue 4, pp: 1-10. |
[15] | Korooki, A. Hakakzadeh, M. Pourranjbar, M. (2023A), Evaluate and compare the design of private sports clubs’ websites in Iran based on two models of WEB-QEM and WAI, Quarterly Journal of Knowledge Management in Sports, Vol 3, Issue 4, pp: 35-47. |
[16] | Korooki, A. Hakakzadeh, M. Pourranjbar, M. (2023B), Evaluation of the design of websites of private sports clubs in Iran based on WEB-QEM, Innovation in Sports Management, Vol 2, Issue 1, pp: 83-90. |
[17] | Korooki, A. Hakakzadeh, M. Pourranjbar, M. (2024A), A comparative study of the design quality of the websites of private sports clubs in Iran and Germany based on the Web Assessment Index method, The Journal of Human Resources Excellence, Vol 5, Issue 1, pp: 20-38. |
[18] | Korooki, A. Hakakzadeh, M. Pourranjbar, M. (2024B), Comparative study of webometric indicators of fitness and recreational sports clubs in Iran and England (selected clubs under study), New Approaches in Sports Mmanagement, 12(44), 46-60. |
[19] | Marincas, D. A. Vultur, S. O. (2007). Website project evaluation: A case study of Romanian Faculty of Economics websites. Applied Quantitative Methods, 2(3), 289-301. |
[20] | McClung, S., Hardin, R., & Mondello, M. J. (2004). Marketing on the web: Collegiate athletic sites. In B. G. Pitts (Ed.), Sharing best practices in sport marketing: The sport marketing association’s inaugural book of papers. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, Inc. pp 35-43. |
[21] | Moradi, Z. (2015), Analysis of the status of Iranian sports newspaper websites in terms of web metrics, Master's thesis in Sports Media Management, Payam Noor University, Alborz Province, Payam Noor Center, Karaj, Department of Sports Management. |
[22] | Nazdar, P. Farahani, A. Parveen, N. Ebrahim-Hesari, S. (2015), Evaluation of the quality of the website of the Ministry of Sports and Youth using the process of hierarchical analysis, communication management in sports media, year 3, number 10, pp: 75-82. |
[23] | Olive Khoirul L. M. A. Faishol, Apol Pribadi Subriadi. (2022), Change management scenario to improve Webometrics ranking, Sixth Information Systems International Conference (ISICO 2021), Procedia Computer Science 197 (2022) 557-565. |
[24] | Olsina, L.; Godoy, D; Lafuente, G. J; Rossi, G.; (1999). Assessing the Quality of Academic Websites: A CaseStudy, In: New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia (NRHM) Journal, Taylor Graham Publishers, UK/USA Vol. 5, pp: 81-103. |
[25] | Ostadzadeh-Mehrabani, B. Mohammadi-Estani, M. (2017), Evaluation of websites of Iranian sports federations based on WQET, Quarterly Journal of Information Management and Science, Year 4, Number 3, pp: 63-76. |
[26] | Rahimizadeh, M. Sajjadi, S. N. Gudarzi, M. (2016), Comparison of online marketing, media content and interaction with fans through the official website of football clubs in Iran, Asia and Europe, Physiology and Management Researches in Sports, Volume 8, Number 2, pp: 109-121. |
[27] | Roh D. Oh Y. S. Park S. H. (2019), Effect of professional sports club website information quality on relationship quality and loyalty (The effect of Information Quality on Relationship Quality and Loyalty of Professional Sports Club Website), Journal of the Korean Physical Science Association, 2019, vol.28, no.2, pp. 695-706. |
[28] | Taherikia, M. Sohri, R. Akbari-Yazdi, H. (2019), Quality evaluation of sports websites using WEBQUAL and QFD approach, Sports Management and Development Quarterly, Year 8, Number 1, Series 17, pp: 47-63. |
[29] | Tumijan W. Rapaiee K. M. Abdul-Latif R. (2022), Relationship between Sports’ club website quality and users’ satisfaction, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) (e-ISSN: 2504-8562). 2022, Volume 7, Issue 4, e001423. |
[30] | Yanpi, T. (2018), Comparing the websites of selected Iranian and foreign clothing and sportswear stores based on web metrics, master's thesis in the field of physical education and sports sciences, strategic management in sports organizations, Mazandaran University, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. |
[31] | Zahedi, Sh. S. (2010), Evaluation of the quality of websites, tools and criteria, Development and Transformation Management Journal of the Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, No. 4, pp. 5-16. |
APA Style
Korooki, A. (2025). Compilation of the Web Page Design Pattern: A Case Study of Private Sports Clubs in Selected Countries. International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education, 10(3), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20251003.17
ACS Style
Korooki, A. Compilation of the Web Page Design Pattern: A Case Study of Private Sports Clubs in Selected Countries. Int. J. Sports Sci. Phys. Educ. 2025, 10(3), 133-154. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20251003.17
@article{10.11648/j.ijsspe.20251003.17, author = {Ali Korooki}, title = {Compilation of the Web Page Design Pattern: A Case Study of Private Sports Clubs in Selected Countries }, journal = {International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {133-154}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsspe.20251003.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20251003.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsspe.20251003.17}, abstract = {Objective: Websites serve as the showcase for sports clubs, and their optimal design attracts users. Combining two evaluation models with a modern approach offers a unique method for presenting an innovative model. The aim of the present study was to develop a framework for designing the web pages of private sports clubs based on the evaluation and comparative analysis of private sports clubs in Iran, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain. Methodology: The research method, in terms of its objective, was applied and descriptive-comparative in nature. The statistical population of this study comprised 80 websites of private sports clubs in Iran, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Spain. To identify the websites of private sports clubs, Google Maps and its advanced settings (selecting the location for the keyword search) were used, along with the keyword “private sports club” in the four countries. Website evaluation was conducted based on the ISO9126-1 model in accordance with the IEEE1061 license. In this evaluation, two models-Web Assessment Index and Web-QEM-were employed. The checklist for the first model (Marincas and Vultur, 2007) includes five main criteria: accessibility, navigability, speed, reliability, and content, assessed on a five-point scale ranging from “very unsuitable” (0-20) to “very suitable” (81-100). The second model (Olsina et al., 1999) consists of four main criteria: usability, functionality, reliability, and efficiency, evaluated on a five-point scale from 0 to 1. In this study, various online and offline software tools were used for the analysis of the criteria. Findings: The results showed that the final ranking of the websites according to both the Web-QEM and Web Assessment Index evaluation methods was, respectively, the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, and Iran. In the Web-QEM method, the websites of the United Kingdom scored 70.6%, Spain 67.15%, Germany 61.3%, and Iran 47.5% out of 100. In the Web Assessment Index method, the websites of the United Kingdom scored 69.55%, Spain 68.85%, Germany 60.25%, and Iran 42.7% out of 1. In both methods, the websites of private sports clubs in the United Kingdom demonstrated the best status, while those in Iran showed the weakest. Conclusion: Managers of private sports clubs should devote the greatest attention to improving the evaluation standards of their clubs’ websites in order to achieve suitable professional success in their business. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Compilation of the Web Page Design Pattern: A Case Study of Private Sports Clubs in Selected Countries AU - Ali Korooki Y1 - 2025/09/15 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20251003.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20251003.17 T2 - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education JF - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education JO - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education SP - 133 EP - 154 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1611 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20251003.17 AB - Objective: Websites serve as the showcase for sports clubs, and their optimal design attracts users. Combining two evaluation models with a modern approach offers a unique method for presenting an innovative model. The aim of the present study was to develop a framework for designing the web pages of private sports clubs based on the evaluation and comparative analysis of private sports clubs in Iran, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain. Methodology: The research method, in terms of its objective, was applied and descriptive-comparative in nature. The statistical population of this study comprised 80 websites of private sports clubs in Iran, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Spain. To identify the websites of private sports clubs, Google Maps and its advanced settings (selecting the location for the keyword search) were used, along with the keyword “private sports club” in the four countries. Website evaluation was conducted based on the ISO9126-1 model in accordance with the IEEE1061 license. In this evaluation, two models-Web Assessment Index and Web-QEM-were employed. The checklist for the first model (Marincas and Vultur, 2007) includes five main criteria: accessibility, navigability, speed, reliability, and content, assessed on a five-point scale ranging from “very unsuitable” (0-20) to “very suitable” (81-100). The second model (Olsina et al., 1999) consists of four main criteria: usability, functionality, reliability, and efficiency, evaluated on a five-point scale from 0 to 1. In this study, various online and offline software tools were used for the analysis of the criteria. Findings: The results showed that the final ranking of the websites according to both the Web-QEM and Web Assessment Index evaluation methods was, respectively, the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, and Iran. In the Web-QEM method, the websites of the United Kingdom scored 70.6%, Spain 67.15%, Germany 61.3%, and Iran 47.5% out of 100. In the Web Assessment Index method, the websites of the United Kingdom scored 69.55%, Spain 68.85%, Germany 60.25%, and Iran 42.7% out of 1. In both methods, the websites of private sports clubs in the United Kingdom demonstrated the best status, while those in Iran showed the weakest. Conclusion: Managers of private sports clubs should devote the greatest attention to improving the evaluation standards of their clubs’ websites in order to achieve suitable professional success in their business. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -